May 15, 2006
No Rest for the Weary
Many Forced to Retire Early
Despite the increasing financial pressure to stay employed, nearly half of U.S. workers leave before they plan to, a survey indicates.
By Jonathan Peterson, Times Staff Writer
May 15, 2006
WASHINGTON American workers, who face growing financial pressure to stay in the workforce, are far more likely to be forced into an early retirement than many expect, according to a study being released today.Four out of 10 retired workers left their jobs sooner than they had planned, usually because of health problems or the loss of employment, according to the report by McKinsey & Co., which was based on a national survey of 3,086 people.
The survey also found that 45% of people who are currently employed planned to keep working past age 65. But among the retirees polled, only 13% said they had done so.
The findings raise fresh concerns about Americans' ability to afford a comfortable retirement. With more companies abandoning or freezing their pensions, many people say they plan to work longer to build up their nest eggs.
The reality "is quite sobering," said David Hunt, a senior partner at McKinsey. "Our research clearly shows that many people and more than a few public policymakers who are betting on simply working longer to compensate for a lack of current savings are setting themselves up for a rude awakening and a significantly poorer standard of living in retirement than they had expected."
Ask Rolf Marsh. The computer programmer was 60 when he got a surprise tap on the shoulder from IBM Corp.
Marsh had planned to work five more years to qualify for higher pension payments, then retire to enjoy a new phase of life, including visits to friends in Britain and other travels with his wife.
"I guess I was blind to the handwriting on the wall," said Marsh, who lives near Spokane, Wash. "I didn't think it was going to happen."
Now 63, Marsh has been frustrated in his attempts to prolong his career. "I looked for work when I first got out basically, there's very little up here in Spokane and the jobs I applied for I didn't get. My feeling was it was because of age."
Marsh estimates that his pension is less than half what it would have been had he remained longer in the job. To boost his income, he signed up for Social Security earlier than planned, further scaling down his retirement pay. Eventually, he and his wife took in an elderly boarder for whom his wife cares to make ends meet. "It's been difficult," he said.
The McKinsey survey included retirees, for which it had a 3.2-percentage-point margin of error, and people who are not retired, for which the margin of error was 2.4 percentage points. It was conducted in March and April among people 40 to 75 years old.
Among those who retired earlier than they expected, 47% cited health reasons and 44% pointed to job loss. The remaining 9% said they had to care for an ailing family member.
Workers with less than $50,000 in assets were most likely to be forced out of their careers because of health problems. Those who had more than $1 million pointed to job loss as the greatest reason for retiring.
I don't know about you, but I'll be working until I'm toes up. Don't have a choice.
Posted by Melanie at May 15, 2006 12:21 PM | TrackBack"47% cited health reasons."
I'm in the 47%. I don't think enough attention is paid to the toll on one's body from 30-plus years of work in the USA. Ever greater workloads; ever greater stress; working 2 jobs to make ends meet. Soon we will all be on Social Security Disability (no legacy costs) or dead from overwork as they used to say about workers in Japan.
My dad, a higschool teacher, was more or less pushed out at 60. (He could have hung on, but it was just too much for him stresswise - they were making his life hell, and the years of working almost double time (he'd pick up work at the local steel mill as well) took its toll). He has an OK pension from US Steel and a good one from the state teacher's program, but the five years he held on until Medicare showed up were very, very tense.
And he was lucky.
I myself am trying to figure out how to live on whatever is available financially come 55 or 56. By then I'll have 30 years at my employer, and they thankfully have a fully funded pension plan. That plus my 401(k) should get me through the worst, knock on wood. Because I suspect a tap on my shoulder will be there by then, if not sooner.
Let's just say I'm working at taking better care of myself since I scanned the numbers, and leave it at that.
"I don't know about you, but I'll be working until I'm toes up. Don't have a choice."
You and 99.44% of recorded history. The idea of "retirement" as a 15-20 year period where you go on cruises, vacations, and otherwise just fuck around is a highly aberrent condition- the result of the confluence of several unique events that are in the last stages of running their course. I realized back in the good old days of the 1990s that I'll be working until I'm dead, senile, or crippled (and if one of the latter pair, then former will not be far behind). No Social Security or Medicare for me; that pot of porridge will be empty long before my number is called.
My parents retired. Their parents retired. It is probably a sign of things to come life expectancies are dropping in the US.
Universal health care is still off the table. Of all the idiocies of which yanks are guilty, this is the big one, that we are willing to die earlier for ideology. I'm sorry, I really don't get that.
Life expectancies are not dropping in the U.S., and that is not what the article linked to in the previous comment states. Rather, the female advantage has shrunk a bit.
Here's a link to a more comprehensive report.
http://tinyurl.com/qavv4


